Stop Video Game Felony Bill In NY & Elsewhere!

We got a letter today from IGDA Executive Director Jason Della Rocca, who asked all IGDA members to educate themselves about and take steps to help prevent the kind of ridiculous anti-gaming legislation that recently breezed through the New York State Department of Condescending Paternalism.
Not only does the law circumvent ESRB ratings and make the selling or rental of games with “depraved violence and indecent images” a class E felony, the bill defines that violence and imagery rather loosely, setting the stage for the battle for game censorship to be fought in court. Which could further alienate the ESA and cause all kinds of potential problems, what with the infinite interpretability of the words "depraved" and "indecent."
Because that makes sense.
If you live in New York State (or even if you don't, I suppose?), please take the time now to call the NY State Senate and Assembly: just tell them where you live to be connected to your legislator's office and tell whomever answers the phone that you expect your state legislator not to regulate video games.
New York State Senate Switchboard: 518-455-2800 New York State Assembly Switchboard: 518-455-4100
Dear IGDA Member/User,
[Urgent: This issue needs immediate attention.
Please read details below and follow request for action.]
I am writing to ask for your help in responding to recent attacks on video games by the New York legislature. Bills introduced by both chambers would, among other things, make it a felony to sell or rent to any minor a game that contains "depraved violence".
GamePolitics has run several posts on this:
- NY Game Law Could Mean a Lifetime Behind Bars for Retailers http://gamepolitics.com/2007/06/01/attorney-ny-game-law-could-mean-a-lifetime-behind-bars-for-retailers/
- Lightning Round for NY Assembly: Video Game Bill Passed in a Day http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/31/lightning-round-for-ny-assembly-video-game-bill-passed-in-a-day/
- Game Retailers Say No Sale to NY Video Game Bill http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/31/game-retailers-association-says-no-sale-to-ny-video-game-bill/
- ANOTHER N.Y. Game Bill - Democratic Proposal Could Turn Retailers into Felons http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/30/another-ny-game-bill-democrat-proposal-could-turn-game-retailers-into-felons/
- NY Video Game Bill Is On Fast Track to Becoming Law http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/22/ny-senate-passes-video-game-bill/
These bills treat video games differently than other forms of art and entertainment like books, movies and music - which are afforded protection from censorship by the First Amendment. The result of any legislation being passed would have a "chilling effect" on our entire industry, regardless of the type of products you develop or the audience they are intended for.
The legislation is also unnecessary because the industry has the self-regulatory program ESRB to rate its products, and provide rating information to consumers and parents. In turn, retailers are enforcing this rating system by not selling mature games to children. Additionally, the latest generation of game consoles provide parental controls that allow parents and users to easily restrict certain game content.
New York has a strong game development community.
As constituents and as contributors to the state's economy, you can have a great impact on this issue and your voices need to be heard.
Take Action
-----------
Simply pick up the phone, call the New York State Capitol's switchboard numbers below, tell the operator where you live, and you'll be connected directly to your legislator's office. Please tell the staff that answers the phone that you expect your state legislator not to regulate video games.
- New York State Senate Switchboard: 518-455-2800
- New York State Assembly Switchboard: 518-455-4100
We expect that the New York Senate and Assembly will come together as soon as Monday afternoon to incorporate their differences into a single bill.
Now is the time to reach out to your State Assemblymember and State Senator and voice opposition to unconstitutional restrictions on video games.
Other states have introduced similar legislation and nine states or localities went as far as to actually enact such legislation. However, in all nine cases, federal courts have declared the bills unconstitutional; finding that video games are artistic forms of expression worthy of the same constitutional protections as other forms of art.
And since a statute that singles out
constitutionally protected speech is a violation of civil rights, prevailing plaintiffs are entitled to an award of court costs and attorney's feel. Thus taxpayers would not only bear the cost of defending an invalid New York law, but also the cost of a successful challenge.
In the past six years, federal district courts have granted over $1.7 million in attorney fees; money that surely could have been better spent.
Federal courts have also overturned this legislation because of the chilling effect it would have on the industry. They have noted that such restrictions on violent content would result in retailers and developers from steering far clear of content that was the intent of the legislation. The difficulty in defining depraved violence would surely lead to ambiguity over what would be covered by the bill. Retailers, in particular, out of fear of prosecution, could simply avoid carrying any video games with content that could loosely apply.
Despite the backing of federal courts, it is not prudent to keep relying on the courts to bring reason to this issue. State legislators will continue to introduce legislation; trying different approaches to sidestep the First Amendment.
Please take a minute to take action and fight against unconstitutional attacks on games and our industry.
Thanks!








wait, i'm confused, this prevents the retailers from selling inappropriate video game content to minors? why would retailers not want this? it's the same with cigarettes and alcohol as far as i can see. wouldn't that only serve to protect the establishments from parents who choose not care what their kids are playing? as far as i'm concerned they need to scan id's or put in numbers for such things. i'm tired of adults not taking responsibility and blaming every one sold the kids the video games, or tabacco products, or alcohol. and that's why it's not our fault for being a shitty parent. just my opinion.
It's a case of punishment doesn't fit the crime.
Motaku: I'm glad someone agrees with me. I ranted about this earlier on the "1984" post. I think people are blowing this way out of proportion. Unless I'm missing something, all I see here is people not selling adult material to children. Makes sense to me.
And they don't define violence losely. They are actually quite specific about what qualifies: rape, evisceration, dismemberment, ect. I don't think kids should be playing with that.
In fact this entire paragraph:
"Not only does the law circumvent ESRB ratings and make the selling or rental of games with “depraved violence and indecent images” a class E felony, the bill defines that violence and imagery rather loosely, setting the stage for the battle for game censorship to be fought in court."
is highly incorrect and inflamatory. You completely skipped the key words "to minors" and stated that it was illegal to sell these games at all. I truely hope that was just a typo on your part, otherwise you're twisting the truth as badly as any right-wing nut.
First you should remember that such a law doesn't exist for other violent entertainment (movies, books, etc). And does any rational adult really think all violent games are going to be banned? Heck not even Tompson goes that far. Yes, there was a misquote, but really folks are not that dumb...
Finally according to google a Class E felony is a 3-4 year jail sentence. I'd say being able to lock away a person because they think children while influenced won't actually do violent things solely due to games is rather well... can't really say dystopian since I can't think of one where knee-jerk reactions were key, but pretty close.
I will defintly agree that the sentance is over blown big time. But I still think that there should be regulations in place so that these games can not be sold to kids.
I don't know if it's technically a law, but kids under 18 can not get into adult movies (I'm in Canada btw). It should be the same for all adult material.
I agree with regulations, but they already exist as as financial incentives in the U.S. Currently most game stores I know would outright fire someone without question if they're caught selling inappropriate games to minors. Not to mention the store could get boycotted, and lose sales so there's a fair aount of vigilence. Can't comment on Canada, but it's pretty much the same thing with movies, and less regulated with books (unless you consider any porn which has more restrictions than Canada).
Personally I think it's best to let society, or some privately approved moral gauge decide what should not should not be played/seen by minors. If nothing else if/when morals change it'll probably be faster to change policies. Not to mention the U.S. Supreme Court has a tendency to remove laws like this, and the rest of the entertainment industry will be doing their best to strike the law down. Really this was nothing more than a waste of taxpayers money to gain votes which irks me.
i agree about not wasting the taxpayer's money, but at the same time, i just feel that we should be a little more vigilant to protect the employees. maybe not a law, but definitely something that requires people's id be used or something to that effect. stores shouldn't have to be responsible for what kids get ahold of, but since we have taken that fault and placed it soley on the industry, it still leaves room for those special parents to say "hey, they sold this to my kid, and then my kid beat the neighbor's kid up because he played the game, gimme money"
but, there is nothing now, except for anime, that even requires we verify that someone is old enough to purchase the products that get sold in the store i work in.
i'm just sayin.